http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article601356.ece
George Galloway was asked this (rather leading, in my opinion!) question;
"Would the assassination of, say, Tony Blair by a suicide bomber - if there were no other casualties - be justified as revenge for the war on Iraq?"
What kind of answer was the reporter expecting?! George Galloway opposed Blair and Bush's invasion of Iraq; he's a political opponent of Blair! 
I'm not a big fan of Galloway, but it seems that he has been given a bad press!
Related news: Apparently Blair is due to be awarded a medal, for his support of Bush in "The War on Terror" (Stupid name!). Medals should be given for acts of heroism (word?), not for some stupid political reason!
Jeremy Vine was talking about it about half an hour ago! There was someone who was pro the war. He was spewing out the same arguments (9/11, WMD, etc!), which have been disproved! 
Made me very angry!
ajnspencer
Pro 
All I need is the means to do it! 
I think someone needs some calming aromatherapy or something
That's a great leading question!
So Miss T, if you could bankrupt Mr Abramovich and thus ensure Chelski's relegation to the first division but no-one else was hurt, would you?
You can see the medal actually, it's HERE in all it's glory.